Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by CarbonCycles 1318 days ago
I agree..this article seems very click-baitish, which I sadly clicked on.

What company wouldn't want to hire the best? I've been casually making mental notes of the positions/titles of the groups impacted, and it follows common sense that talent acquisition, administrative, junior level employees, units that no longer support the business mission, and low-performing employees (or ones that don't fit the culture) were let go.

If anything, the article could have pointed out that the performance expectations have been shifted-up a notch or two as the remaining employees (once considered to be high-performers) are now "average". This could become a vicious negative feed-back cycle if not appropriately managed.

sigh Corporate life can definitely be a drag. The holidays can't come fast enough!