Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by gjsman-1000 1320 days ago
I don't think that is as much of an issue as the ridiculous process he had to go through.

Think about that first security researcher. You literally found a Screen Unlock bypass (should be Priority #1, right?) - and Google just went and put fixing it on the backburner.

If they will put something like that on the backburner, what else are they ignoring? It isn't confidence-inspiring.

Edit: Also, knowing Google, what are the odds of your full refactor? "Temporary" fixes become permanent fixes quickly.

3 comments

> Edit: Also, knowing Google, what are the odds of your full refactor? "Temporary" fixes become permanent fixes quickly.

Hahah, I wish that was only Google :D

Could have been sold for up to 300k or more on the black market.
Maybe it was an already well known exploit. After all this was a duplicate and Google was sitting on it. Two people found it and reported it to Google. Why not a third one, and sold it?
Hahah it can go both ways.

You can have 2 major rewrite over 3 years or you can have a new temporary-became-permanent bug fix.