|
|
|
|
|
|
by gadflyinyoureye
1313 days ago
|
|
|
They won’t. This means that there will be properties eventually owned by a local taxing authority. What people don’t get is that you need some houses to sit empty. This allows people to find a place when they move. This allows people to move around within a territory. Also not all secondary houses are bad. I want to buy a plot of land for a small farm and a place to go in case of hurricanes. Presently there is no house. Should I be taxed for improving land for personal ways that didn’t remove housing? Many of the comments so far are emotional. We need to do better when making policies. |
|
|
I’ve never done this so don’t know the answer, but when you build a house don’t you then also start to get government services in support of that house?