Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by disgruntledphd2 1319 days ago
It would have cratered their gross margins though, which would have meant a (potentially permanent) hit to the share price.

I agree that it would have been a good strategy, but that's (presumably) why they never did it.

2 comments

Interesting. Is that because payments are much lower margin than ads? Surely investors would be smart enough to see the additional revenue, and likely additional benefit to the ads business, as being worth it?
Investors like standardized numbers apparently
Payment has much higher multiple especially compared to FB. It’s quite literally the closest thing to printing money.
It doesn't have the same margins as advertising.