|
|
|
|
|
|
by magic_hamster
1317 days ago
|
|
|
This is vastly different. Chess is a battle of minds between people while you don't necessarily need context to enjoy art, and that's where AI art is likely to take over. Yes, considering the story behind art pieces and the artist does significantly impact the way we interact with art, but you can still just like a painting or a piece of pixel art without knowing anything else about it. While Chess is about the players, art has products that exist on their own. |
|
|
I guess that depends on what the definition of art is. If it's a digitally rendered illustration then maybe.
If it's a physical object crafted to imperfect perfections then no. AI can probably produce some alternative version of Guernica but that's just a fascimile of something that's already been made in a digital space.
I can see an artist using these tools as a way to produce ground-breaking work in the future but I would wager the artist that does that could make good art without any of these tools. You still need a craftsman to master the tools and without knowing the basics you're left with images of Elon Musk as a Disney princess on repeat.