|
|
|
|
|
by philderbeast
1318 days ago
|
|
If the speed users grasp the information presented is most important, is there any objective measurement that 1 vs 2 spaces actually makes a difference. I would suggest rather then some arcane spacing convention, the simplicity and clarity of the wording is objectively far more important then any style guide. I would also suggest that this is something the legal profession is generally very bad at with the amount of legal jargon found in most documents produced in the profession. |
|
One (small) study said that two spaces increases reading speed by about 3% [0] [1] [2]; I couldn't find any indication whether scanning and skimming speeds were studied.
From an article: "When the double-space was present, their eyes fixated less on the break between sentences and they moved to the next one more quickly. Ultimately, it seemed it was a bit easier for their brains to make sense of when sentences were more clearly broken up." [3]
> the simplicity and clarity of the wording is objectively far more important [than] any style guide. ... this is something the legal profession is generally very bad at with the amount of legal jargon found in most documents produced in the profession.
Agreed! I teach advanced contract drafting to third-year law students; I stress two principal rules: (A) Short, Single-Subject Paragraphs — don't be a L.O.A.D. [Lazy Or Arrogant Drafter] [4], and (B) BLUF - Bottom Line Up Front [5]. Following those two rules will produce the biggest bang for the buck in terms of improved readability.
[0] https://link.springer.com/epdf/10.3758/s13414-018-1527-6?sha...
[1] https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/05/two-spac...
[2] https://medicalxpress.com/news/2018-05-space-period-sentence...
[3] https://www.discovermagazine.com/mind/scientists-two-spaces-...
[4] https://toedtclassnotes.site44.com/Notes-on-Contract-Draftin...
[5] https://toedtclassnotes.site44.com/Notes-on-Contract-Draftin...