Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by howinteresting 1324 days ago
Raptor Lake is roughly equivalent in perf/watt to Zen 4 and Apple's M series, at least going by eco mode benchmarks. Seems like E cores would get better idle consumption as well.

The days of 14nm+++++++ are over.

edit: sorry meant Raptor Lake.

1 comments

I have a hard time believing that Intel is beating Apple Silicon in performance per watt.
So did I until I saw the Cinebench numbers at 65W.
So why not link them?
Mostly because I can't find them with a quick Google search and I don't want to put more time into it.

edit: found them: https://www.club386.com/intel-core-i9-13900k-vs-amd-ryzen-9-...

M1 ultra Cinebench is 21700 or so.