|
|
|
|
|
|
by Beldin
1325 days ago
|
|
|
Perhaps, under US law.
If the creator felt confident about that and only intended to sell this game in the USA, then perhaps a lawsuit could be worth it. Then again, the "parody" defense may require something more than "the setting is obviously a take on this trademark", something sufficient to label it "transformative". No clue what the legal standard for that is. |
|
|
Even in US law, no, there's no scenario wherein the lawsuit against IKEA would be worth ~$50k in revenue (not profit).