|
|
|
|
|
by alphabettsy
1315 days ago
|
|
I think there’s probably a lot more to consider. Like the fact that Twitter is much older and likely has significant technical debt. There’s also the fact that Twitter is in many ways an Ads and News platform. The comes with significant non-engineering overhead. |
|
I don't know how many people it would actually take to run Twitter, but I suspect the number is far lower than most would expect. In particular, the product team has always seemed enormous to me compared to those at other social media companies when comparing customer numbers and velocity of new features.