|
|
|
|
|
by hoten
1330 days ago
|
|
If they laid off 3700 people, assuming 200,000 dollars each, that's 75% of the way there. edit: oh, I suppose you wouldn't consider personnel "infrastructure". I'll keep this up despite how off topic I am, it's interesting to compare the reduced cost in labor to the stated goal in reducing infrastructure costs. A billion here, a billion there... Soon we're talking about real money. |
|