[paxys]

I can't speak to the legalese, but on the surface the complaint sounds ridiculous.

> The complaint alleges that the Meta directors failed to consider that shareholders with diversified portfolios may be subject to net losses from Meta’s pursuit of a business model that maximizes advertising revenue without regard to the harms it inflicts on the rest of their portfolios. In particular, the complaint identifies press reports establishing that the company knew that its conduct was leading to mental health issues for millions of users and increasingly negative political rhetoric, while facilitating ethnic cleansing, drug cartels, modern slavery, and vaccine disinformation. These activities pose risks to political stability, public health, and rule of law, threatening the intrinsic value of the global economy and thus the value of diversified portfolios.

Is there any company in existence that would clear this bar?

[nradov]

Lawsuits like this are just political theater, abusing the court system to publicize a particular social issue. The plaintiffs know they have no hope of winning a judgment, but if they can bring enough negative publicity to Meta then the company might actually change some policies.