Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by MichaelCollins 1319 days ago
Ads often mention the price of the product. The article goes on and on about the supposed benefits of giving your kid a smart watch, specifically the Apple brand of smart watch, contrasting it favorably to buying them a phone instead.

At the very least, it's not negative coverage of Apple. Even if you think it neutral coverage (I don't), it's a counter-example to the supposed directive that all tech coverage have a negative tone. And they categorized it as tech news, not business news.
1 comments
Cupertino95014 1319 days ago
OK, $279 is actually a negative for a lot of parents, but I guess not for you.
link
MichaelCollins 1319 days ago
The article is promoting this product as a better alternative than buying a smartphone for your kids. $279 is cheaper than most smartphones. And it's not too hard to find overt Apple ads that list much higher prices. Listing the price of a product in an article singing praises of that product does not constitute the article being critical of Apple.
link
Cupertino95014 1319 days ago
Perhaps we've exhausted this topic. I view it as mildly positive and very weak journalism, not balanced. Your view is more drastic.

A balanced article would have found some parents who all said, "Hell, no, I'm not buying that for him. He'll lose it inside of a month." There are probably a lot of such parents.

As for "singing praises of that product" -- I think that is totally legitimate. It IS a product that does a lot of stuff and some people might like it for that. Do you expect them to invent some faults with it?

I'd also expect a real journalist to get some numbers on their sales, not just find one user who likes it.

(On the other hand, Walt Mossberg would have tried it for a week and given it a grade, idk what.)

link