They mostly don't say nonsense. I listened to the whole thing and I found it very convincing. I've never been able to listen all the way through AI generated content before. It's hard for me to believe this was 100% AI generated.
> I listened to the whole thing and I found it very convincing.
Eh? "Lex Fridman's" voice is shaky as fuck in the first 30 seconds and apparently he can't pronounce science now? - it says sci-in. (It continues to be flawed - he sounds sick when he says UC Berkeley).
If I heard this knowing it was really him I would be concerned he was having a stroke.
His voice is defective enough that it is actually irritating to listen to.
Also, the opening monologue doesn't sound much like Feynman's style - he was known for being irreverent, flippant, intense and maybe even occasionally dismissive - but not this aggressive - certainly in a sitdown interview he agreed to. Also hard to believe he would fuck up the word "interviewee".
This would only fool someone that has never heard Feynman speak for an appreciable period - but then you might as well get a decent impersonator.
And really the content doesn't hold up to even basic critical listening scrutiny.
> They mostly don't say nonsense.
Oh god dude, most of the material is false and easily verified as false from basic sources. It's mostly nonsense.
EDIT: Ok listening to segment between 3:30 and 4:30 I know I'm being trolled.
I think the beginning and end of the value of these is as a tech demo. At this point in the lifecycle of the technology, I don't think anyone is trying to achieve novel, valuable content.