|
|
|
|
|
by dragontamer
1323 days ago
|
|
Its the terms of the contract. Twitter borrowed $13 Billion, not Elon Musk. Technically, "X Holdings" took on the debt (a new company Elon started up), but "X Holdings" is effectively Twitter now. > I can’t just buy a house with a mortgage and walk away. If you create a business, lets say "Foobar Incorporated", and get the banks to recognize the debt as assigned to "Foobar Incorporated", you can walk away as "Foobar Incorporated" goes bankrupt. Similarly, it is "X Holdings" who goes bankrupt in this arrangement, not Elon Musk. |
|