|
|
|
|
|
by bluesmoon
1317 days ago
|
|
I'm not sure how you came to the conclusion that "Akamai is whining" about this. It's an informational blog post about what's happening and what's changing. User Agent strings aren't used for feature detection, they're used for classification. As a developer, when you're trying to fix a bug reported by a customer, it helps to know exactly which browser right down to the patch version that bug shows up in so that you can try and reproduce the bug in the same environment. |
|
> At Akamai, we use the User-Agent header at the edge and as part of many Akamai products for business logic
The post then goes on to describe several things that are expected to break (or would be breaking—if Akamai weren't taking steps on their end) since they rely on the value of client's User-Agent header, and it affects how they respond. It's definitely not just for being used at Akamai to help reproduce bugs in the same environments...