[cryptoanon]

> I'm just saying, the idea that people are not entitled to come to conclusions based on partial information is not valid.

It’s possible to get scammed by a person that’s telling you that something is a scam. That’s an affinity scam.

I’m not trying to tell you what to think. I’m saying that there are material flaws in the analysis.

[tucnak]

Don't worry, your critique is fair and square, what you have to understand is that you probably piss a fair amount of people here already by virtue of your username alone! Cue takes on how "affinity scam" somehow doesn't apply & even more contrarian moaning re: crypto bad.

[yellowapple]

Is "crypto bad" even contrarian? It strikes me as the precise opposite: conformity to the "traditional finance good" status quo.

[tucnak]

From the point of reference set to HN? I think so, yes, why not?