|
|
|
|
|
|
by Darmody
1366 days ago
|
|
|
Good luck to whoever is working on it but if the original devs couldn't keep it alive because of VSC, I don't think anyone else will. I think both editors play in the same league and VSC has the community which is was matters. |
|
|
But to continue on your logic path...
You are right in that the original devs couldn't keep it alive because of VSC, but your correlating that this is because of a lack of community interest, which I think is far from the truth.
The reality is Microsoft owns Github, and they own VSC. Why pay to support two editors? Between the two VSC is more clearly "their" product, so they try to kill Atom to further help their product.
But VSC is dangerous, imho. Not only does it watch all sorts of things you are doing, it's just locking you into the same hegemony that brought you the frightening CoPilot AI that is scanning everybody's code on Github, creating all sorts of problems. https://thenextweb.com/news/github-copilot-works-so-well-bec...
Whereas one of the first things the Pulsar group did was remove "telemetry" from the code base, making it more of a free "no strings attached" community editor.
However, to each their own, as I suggested :) Not everybody likes Atom, but MANY people do. It certainly is not a minor editor by ANY count.
Just because it's #2 or #3 compared to VSC? That's a pretty lofty position.
And if you enjoy suckling from teat of Microsoft on VSC, by all means continue to do so. I am not a fan of their sins of the past and present, so I avoid them when possible.
And personally, I like the configurability of Atom far more than VSC, which I've tried it from time to time—but it's just a different experience, not to my liking.