|
|
|
|
|
by Vetch
1327 days ago
|
|
> NN based sentiment analysis is certainly a lot better than non-NN based techniques. I wouldn't say this. Sentiment analysis trained on the standard datasets is one place where performance is barely better than old-school linear classifiers. They remained brittle and easy to trick until recent flexible systems systems based on question answering, zero-shot entailment or lotsa instruction finetuning (improving in that order). I strongly advice against using something fine-tuned solely on sentiment datasets. It'd be a total waste. |
|
Well yeah. But why would you do that?
Do what eveyrone does: Train on large scale a language corpus (or use a pre-trained model) then finetune for sentiment analysis.
> I strongly advice against using something fine-tuned solely on sentiment datasets
Did you mean trained on sentiment datasets? I agree with that.
Otherwise, well [1] is a decent overview of the field. I think Document Vectors using Cosine Similarity[2] at 17 is the highest rated that isn't a NN trained on large corpus and fine-tune on sentiment task. Even that uses document vectors that are trained on a large language corpus.
[1] https://paperswithcode.com/sota/sentiment-analysis-on-imdb
[2] https://paperswithcode.com/paper/the-document-vectors-using-...