Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by unfolding 1323 days ago
1 billion years is a long time. would a metallic alloy last a billion years? maybe we are better carving it into stone
1 comments

You'd want to select it special to be non-reactive, and even then limit or eliminate exposure to UV, oxygen, and temperature changes. Stone is also a changing material on this time scale and I think storage preference would largely be the same. I think one of the more salient differences is feature size; easier to make very small yet still legible images in metal than in stone.