[simplotek]

> No one is saying you can't be critical of your own employer. They are saying there are repercussions to being critical and loss of employment is a common one which should be expected.

Why do you feel that the expected outcome of being critical is being punished instead of addressing the root causes of these issues? I mean how do you expect problems to be pointed out and addressed?

[midoridensha]

>I mean how do you expect problems to be pointed out and addressed?

Apparently, at Twitter, you don't.

[simplotek]

> Apparently, at Twitter, you don't.

Twitter is itching to shed people any way they can, so the problem lies elsewhere.

[tssva]

Most companies I have worked for have a means to point out problems in an internal non-public manner. Once you bypass those to go public you generally lose the trust of your employer. Why would you employ someone you can no longer trust?

[metadat]

Is the status quo today akin to the story of The Emperor's New Clothes?