[cyberphobe]

AGPLv3 does not somehow permit trademark violations. Signal has taken issue with third parties building binaries and calling them Signal, and I can’t really blame them. This is the same reason Signal isn’t in F-Droid

[Zak]

DMCA takedowns are for copyright only, not trademark. Requesting or demanding removal for trademark reasons is legitimate, but using the DMCA takedown process when there is not a copyright violation is fraudulent.

[tadfisher]

Because the AGPLv3 allows for trademark restrictions, violating the trademark revokes the copyright license.

[monocasa]

AGPLv3 allows for adding trademark terms, which signal has not done.

[kevin_b_er]

And the DMCA is about copyright. Where's trademark mentioned?

[tingletech]

Violating trademark triggers AGPLv3 license to be invalid, thus the copyright claim.

[Murrawhip]

No, AGPLv3 allows for adding an additional term regarding trademark. Signal-desktop is using the default APGLv3 without such a term.