|
|
|
|
|
by Rediscover
1325 days ago
|
|
Semi-OT: You just reminded me of dealing with subsidiaries in the1980s and 1990's. (Before chain of certs). I spoke up about it on a mailing (probably an IETF one) list about subsidiary companies should be required to have not xyz.com but xyz.<owning company>.<over-seeing owner company>.com as their address.
Example: In the U.S. it's not simple to get /real/ xyz with all the vitamins. So a hypothetical xyz.com should really turn up on search result as xyz.<parent company>.com. Adjust as fit. Maybe $xx/year or the quantity of companies underneath the majorowner before compliance. I was praising the value of something I did know the USian market had a distributorship over [in the geographical real] with a sub-standard product. Let me know that I am looking at stats on y product (only served in z country). Let me know that xyz name in my country is different ta your place. |
|