Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Rediscover 1325 days ago
Semi-OT: You just reminded me of dealing with subsidiaries in the1980s and 1990's. (Before chain of certs).

I spoke up about it on a mailing (probably an IETF one) list about subsidiary companies should be required to have not xyz.com but xyz.<owning company>.<over-seeing owner company>.com as their address. Example: In the U.S. it's not simple to get /real/ xyz with all the vitamins. So a hypothetical xyz.com should really turn up on search result as xyz.<parent company>.com.

Adjust as fit. Maybe $xx/year or the quantity of companies underneath the majorowner before compliance.

I was praising the value of something I did know the USian market had a distributorship over [in the geographical real] with a sub-standard product.

Let me know that I am looking at stats on y product (only served in z country).

Let me know that xyz name in my country is different ta your place.