[_kbh_]

> "the UN" had done a lot of reports related to the Angloamerican propaganda in the past as well, and the results of each precisely reflected the agenda of whichever country was leading that particular commission at that given moment. This includes all the 'genocides' attributed to the enemies of the US.

Once again you say a lot with no proof, it’s easy to write paragraphs of nothingness that backup whatever propaganda you are trying to push or believe, it’s much harder to do it with an actual credible source.

> So, sorry, but I shall pass that as a source as well.

> Neither do I see a source in your response.

Did you miss the url I posted to the report?. Or are you simply dismissing anything that doesn’t fit the narrative you are trying to push?.

But regardless you haven’t posted any source for any of your claims and continue to write paragraph long replies with no evidence of anything.

[unity1001]

> credible source

There is nothing credible about 'independent' UN commissions. They are set up depending on who is the president of a given UN organization and the members composing it. It produces whatever the countries that compose that commission wants. Its not a democratic process that involves the general assembly that you could think 'the UN' said it. Its a bunch of people designated by a few countries that populate a given commission at any given point .Always has been like that.

Case in point: The Ukrainian government took over Bucha, but waited THREE weeks until they revealed the 'massacre'. Bucha's governor was posting tiktok videos from Bucha during the time showing Bucha and its streets, pretty upbeat, without mentioning anything regarding a 'massacre'.

Then the UK takes the presidency of the human rights commission and voila - suddenly there is a massacre, and an 'independent' commission created by the human rights commission with UK presidency makes a report to deceive people like you.

> Did you miss the url I posted to the report?

I didnt. You seem to have missed the part where I said how Saudi Arabia got the human rights commission presidency a while ago. Unlike you, I know how the UN and its commissions work.

If there was a massacre in Bucha, it would be revealed immediately after the Ukrainian army took over Bucha. Unless, it was the Ukranian nazis who committed it - as it appears to be - and they wanted to wait for the UK to get the HRC presidency to 'reveal' it.

Thats what 80% of the world thinks.

[_kbh_]

You have yet again not posted a single source for your claims, in fact you haven’t posted a single source for any claim in this thread.

Your rambling multiple paragraph replies aren’t sources and won’t stop the fact that the world now knows that Russia tortures and rape civilians and children, and commits massacres and genocide in occupied territories.

This isn’t that surprising though as it’s not the first time the Russian army has decided to try and use civilian deaths and torture tactics as a method of war, Chechnya suffered similar horrors.

> Unless, it was the Ukranian nazis who committed it - as it appears to be - and they wanted to wait for the UK to get the HRC presidency to 'reveal' it.

I’m kinda interested how you square Wagner, the Russian nazi PMC that prides itself on torturing people and even have posted videos of them castrating Ukrainian solders with “nazi Ukrainians”.

There’s no proof of any of your claims and there never will be because none of it’s true.