|
|
|
|
|
by d33
1327 days ago
|
|
I like the idea, but if it was interpreted directly, that would be a security nightmare unless we also had something like Python's ast.literal_eval(). Which makes us come back to JSON-like outputs because we need some form of serialization anyway, I guess. |
|
You could have an eval that only read variables, but trusting a program to only return variables is a really low bar; it's very hard to mess that up.