[ttcbj]

Thanks for this. I just bought new 14tb drives for my synology nas, and I looked at your data when I did so.

Separately, my nas running RAID 10 worked as it was supposed to: I hot swapped the drives one at a time over several weeks, and went from 7tb storage to something like 24tb with no downtime or hassle. The device has been sitting in my basement for years, and it was cool to see the raid technology work as intended after all this time.

[mxuribe]

Hi @ttcbj I am on the market for a dedicated NAS device, and have heard good things here and there about the Synology brand. Would you mind sharing which model you have been using? Thanks!

[ksec]

You buy Synology for their Software. Otherwise their Hardware are comparatively weak for the same price.

One thing to note about Synology, is that they dont update their Linux Kernel over the life time of its product. I am thinking if they are making changes considering there are products being sold not long ago with very outdated kennel.

And considering the amount of polish and fixes inside BTRFS, you might want to look into it if it could be a problem for your use cases.

Generally speaking it is good enough for most consumers.

[ttcbj]

I am the OP, and I have a DS 918+ and I have been very happy with it. But I am not a hardware expert, so I don't claim to know what hardware you should buy.

What I like about synology is the operating system/software. You can connect to it with a web browser, and it has something akin to a traditional operating system interface that lets you control all its functions.

I have found it very good as a file server for business/home office use, and as a backup target for multiple mac computers using time-machine. It also has very good online support, both from synology itself, and lots of freelance youtube/web help.

The other thing I personally really like is its "hyper backup" feature, which replicates all your NAS files (or those you choose) to the cloud, so they can be restored later.

I have also found it to be totally trouble free. I just installed the drives (they have a list of compatible ones), choose my RAID, and it has worked seamlessly for many years (I have a DS218+ as well that has worked well). It sends me emails reporting drive health, confirming backup completion, etc.

[ganoushoreilly]

Not OP but the biggest thing to look at amongst the models is Network connectivity speed requirements, Storage requirements (Size and Number of drives), and if you plan on running containers / applications on the nas.

The While pricier the DS18xx range are the most common I've seen (depending on your budget). If you plan on getting one used off ebay, look out for the 1815+ and others in the xx15 generation, they had faulty intel atom chips that ended up hosing the systems sadly.

I've got a couple DS1817 's with the DX517 expansion chassis added on (total of 18 drives). They've been great for storing movies / media but unfortunately they're a bit low powered for transcoding.

[mxuribe]

Thanks very much!

[verisimilitude]

Also not OP, but another yes to Synology - I have also found them to be worth it. I've been running mine (DS1517+) for 5.5 years continuously now.

I wirelessly back up my Macs and then use Backblaze B2 for offsite backups of that. I've found by combining this with the snapshot features of btrfs that this has been reliable.

My Synology is wired to my home cat 6, and the only thing stopping me from getting 10GbE to the devices that need it most is the stubbornly high prices of 10GBASE-T switches (I keep hearing it has something to do with heat (?)).

If you choose to mirror your drives, you can achieve some really good read speeds, which is nice.

[mxuribe]

This is great to hear; thanks for sharing!

[hoseja]

Hi, I would just like to point out that a PC/storage server that you build yourself, running TrueNAS or something is definitely an option and might be cheaper and better.

[mxuribe]

I sort of do this now...well, not trueNas...but a regular (though solidly running) PC...which has been on xubuntu for years, and i simply have a neat set of samba shares. I guess i was looking for something smaller, quieter, but mostly less power-sucking. Sure, i guess i can try and cobble something together out of NUCs, or somesuch small form factor PC...but was thinking about a dedicated NAS...but yeah, hardware concerns are a thing for me. But, right now, i still am leaning towards researching a dedicated, purpose-built NAS device.