|
|
|
|
|
|
by blueflow
1327 days ago
|
|
|
Bad argument, glibc and musl are not always compatible, and you can use that as argument against either. When it comes to standards, musl is actually the more conformant one. The glibc 2.26 release with the ucontext breakages made me stick with musl. Plus, when i did multiarch support in Alpine later, i found that LDSO paths for musl are much more systematically and don't have name collisions like glibc. |
|
|