[MalseMattie]

Glad to see that Evan You has stepped up with a response. When these 10x improvements were presented without a release of the benchmark code I was very sceptical. Vercel, do better! You champion yourself as a leader in the OSS React ecosystem, so please act accordingly. This has eroded my trust and excitement for your products.

[mhoad]

Vercel give me nothing but very suspect vibes. I don’t know what it is exactly but reminds me a lot of the cryptocurrency crowd.

[cheq]

Is this way of showing, very similar to an Apple keynote in tone, form, timing, presentation, etc, that is really commercial, and we are a little used to (that's the vibe it's giving). Selling their products doing this 'keynotes' talking about new exciting stuff and 'performance' increase based on my ass metrics, just to build hype and fomo, for a JS framework, it just feels odd.

[yashap]

My main experience with their software is turborepo, which is IMO great. Don’t know much about their marketing or community, but turborepo is an excellent tool, much prefer it to nx and lerna (it’s main competitors).

[begueradj]

Vercel is like Youtube influencers

[411111111111111]

It's still baffling to me that a profession called influencer can exist.

How do people take anything from them serious when their job description is literally taking money in order to influence people...

I guess that's just our society. We love to be told what we should feel/do/care about on a societal level, so people gobble it up even if the content is obviously just paid marketing

[TeMPOraL]

What's even more horrifying is that this is considered a legitimate career; in fact, it's what a lot of kids today want to be, in lieu of pursuing something socially useful.

Let's be clear here: being an influencer literally means you're voluntarily accepting money for lying to people, at scale. You enrich yourself by harming others. You're actively proving you're corrupted and cannot be trusted.

How people making this choice are not shunned by society is beyond me.

[rowanG077]

I dislike influencers as well but this comment is painfully incorrect. Beeing an influencer does not mean you have to lie. You are however strongly influenced to lie. But that doesn't mean every influencer lies. There are plenty of very big influencer that can easily pick and choose which product they peddle to the masses. They are free to pick only the products where they agree with the marketing message.

[jrochkind1]

I think it's probably hard to distinguish what you truly "agree with" if your income relies on agreeing with it. You can avoid shilling for things you truly know are just out and out scams (although it will make your career harder, sure, before you are successful enough to call the shots yourself), but you have a lot of interest in convincing yourself you like the things that pay you. Reminds me of the well-known Upton Sinclair quote “It's difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on not understanding it."

But if there are some influencers that make it very clear on all social media that it's a "paid placement", that they are getting paid to shill for the thing -- then I would definitely have a lot more respect for those folks. I'm not sure this is possible though? it would definitely make your "job" a lot harder, and that is telling.

But I don't necessarily want to demonize influencers; I more feel sorry for them, most of whom are hustling without making a ton of money. But the whole thing seems very sordid to me.

[cjf101]

I think this demonstrates how _insidious_ influencer marketing is. We feel like we're privvy to the behind the scenes decision making about this influencer or that one. But we aren't. We don't really know if they are really choosing the products they wish to promote, or if there are other considerations that influenced that decision.

The aim of influencer marketing is to leverage parasocial relationships to sell stuff, and it works because people think of influencers more like 'a somewhat distant friend' than a talking head or a traditional paid promoter.

[DangitBobby]

Sales and marketing are not new.

[hbn]

Sales and marketing people aren't the face of the ad though.

I'm more comfortable with "Coca-cola pays me money to make ads on behalf of Coca-cola" compared to "literally any company pays me to pretend I'm just a regular person who discovered this cool new product and it's so life-changing that I have to tell my loyal followers"

[TeMPOraL]

Yes, and I've held that opinion for a long time, and expressed it wrt. marketing in general here many times. But there are degrees to how blatantly one gets paid for defrauding your fellow people, and influencers are near the top of it.

[lovich]

If we’re going to start shunning people for that level of harmful impact I think this board might be affected at a higher rate than the average population. Isn’t a large chunk of the users here employees from firms making all their money off of ads?

I don’t see how advertisements aren’t lying and manipulation at scale in a meaningfuly different capacity

[TeMPOraL]

Sure, I'm not denying it. I still[0] maintain that advertising is a cancer on modern society, and I've successfully steered my career away from anything related to adtech. HN itself is a diverse crowd, there's a large crowd with strong anti-marketing sentiment here, including people currently working in adtech.

Also, there are degrees to everything. I'm picking on influencing here because it's extremely direct and blatant form of manipulation. If that isn't rejected by society at large, then there's no hope for it dealing with more traditional forms of manipulation.

----

[0] - http://jacek.zlydach.pl/blog/2019-07-31-ads-as-cancer.html

[Idiot211]

So basically they want to go into marketing?

[jrochkind1]

> their job description is literally taking money in order to influence people

I mean, that's literally just a descirption of marketing, right? Or Public Relations. Taking money to influence people? It's a whole industry.

What an influencer brings to it is that they use one person's own personal likeness as a 'brand'... and try not to disclose the extent to which they are getting paid for marketing and/or PR. Which yeah, takes an already suspicious industry and makes it both more so and more... pathetic, if that's the right word. Most attempted "influencers" are struggling/hustling without making a ton of money, but even those who are successful seem just in a sad place to me.

[uncletaco]

An influencer, IMO, is no different from a talk show host, radio personality, or anyone who's livelihood depends on sponsored content. We've had models in advertising forever and famous people endorse products.

What's happening here is someone is getting famous outside of the traditional avenues of entertainment (radio, tv, sports, movies) through social media and getting the same sponsorship deals. They've just been given a bad name to lump them all together. I'm not a fan of the label "influencer" but I think it's nonsense to see them as a sign of societal decay. Societal change maybe, but its not dire IMO.

[WorldMaker]

As you say, it is a job category that has existed for a long time. (In addition to examples already given, other specific titles off the top of my head spanning centuries: cigarette girls, playboy bunnies, bar girls, steak ladies, brand ambassadors, spokespersons, sign spinners, spokesmodels, …) As long as marketing has existed these jobs have also existed, they've just always before been typically given extremely specific names, often (especially in old fashioned ones) so specific even to specific genders.

I think it actually is useful to have a generic term for this as well across that multi-century spectrum of too specifically named and niched sub-jobs. It makes a useful lens to even better describe our own history. ("What's a cigarette girl? Well in the height of Big Tobacco the Tobacco companies would pay ladies, generally pretty ones, to be influencers selling cigarettes at other businesses such as a bars. Many of these influencers were not employees of the bars, they were more directly contractors for the Tobacco companies.")

I even think that the generic sense of revulsion many have to the specific word "influencer" is actually a useful part of that, too. These jobs were never pretty. Many were designed to be in the background marketing things to people like bad magic tricks designed to misdirect slight bits of money. Influencers are not necessarily a bad thing, and those are sometimes useful jobs in their own little ways, but having the generic term itself be a little revulsive is maybe a great reminder that they aren't always our (parasocial) friends, either, and are still trying to sell us stuff at the end of the day.

(A lot of people assumed cigarette girls worked for the bars or restaurants they found them in, when really that was a direct marketing arm of the cigarette companies. Alcohol companies to this day also hire a lot of "brand ambassadors" the now gender neutral, PC term that they prefer over "influencer", though "bar girls" was also a name for that not even that many decades back, and these influencers do the exact same thing: there are people in bars selling you alcohol, with the permission of the bar owners, of course, but employed by the marketing arms of the alcohol companies. Because they aren't bar employees they are legally "allowed" to often "get more personal" and sometimes don't even pretend to be "on the clock" working. Even more fun, some of these "brand ambassadors" for alchohol are only barely paid in like product because these "brand ambassadors" are doing it "on their own" "for fun" like a rewards program and multi-level marketing had a baby that decided selling alcohol to already drunk people was a perfect business model, which is also a fun way to skirt labor laws if you can get it and maybe not obvious with a title like "brand ambassador" but a bit easier to suspect if you call it "influencer".)

[synthc]

It's just the evolution of a marketeer.

[rjzzleep]

It just tells you how broken the understanding of value in current society really is.

When someone posting videos of themselves testing lipstick or 10 dollar dresses makes more money than dozens highly trained real engineers that build physical goods necessary for the betterment of society and the world as a whole, it does in fact explain, to some extent, why we have a child book author running the entirety of hard work of generations of people that built the German industry into the ground.

[BoorishBears]

What you're doing is kind of like claiming society values Powerball winners over engineers because Powerball winners make more money.

> When someone posting videos of themselves testing lipstick or 10 dollar dresses makes more money than dozens highly trained real engineers that build physical goods necessary for the betterment of society and the world as a whole

Some people who do that almost every single day for years eventually work up to that. For every one person who reaches that mark as an influencer there are 1000 more who do that work and make... zilch. It's like winning the lottery with a little bit of agency sprinkled in.

Equity is a thing, but I don't know many engineers working for zero dollars on the hope that one day maybe they'll get lucky and become one of the minority of engineers who make any money...

-

Also:

> why we have a child book author running the entirety of hard work of generations of people that built the German industry into the ground.

huh?

[jrochkind1]

Very very few "influencers" make more money than engineers.

("Engineers"... when software engineers largely working on advertising and smoothing commerce to sell people garbage they don't need make more money than most "real engineers that build physical goods necessary for the betterment of society"... yeah, it's not just about the influencers, we can look in the mirror, the majority (although not all) of software engineers making mid-six-figures are probably working on selling people crap one way or another, not making anything necessary for the "betterment of society")

But yeah, the vast majority of "influencers" are hustling and struggling and dreaming of being the very succesful 1% while in fact barely making enough to get by. Which seems to me important to talk about when we start talking about "influencers" as as a class or career. There are a tiny portion of "influencers" who get mega-wealthy, we hear about them because they are click bait for media coverage of course (very meta).

In general, becoming a software engineer through a boot camp would be a lot more reliable way to make $100-$200K than being an "influencer" -- you don't even need to be a very good coder to break $100K, which most influencers (let alone aspiring influencers) don't break.

https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2022/feb/24/hustle-and-h...

https://nealschaffer.com/how-much-do-instagram-influencers-m...

[cercatrova]

The labor theory of value is not real, only the subjective theory of value is. People pay for what they like. Who are you to judge why people shouldn't value others testing lipstick over some engineers?

[TeMPOraL]

The labor theory of value is "not real" in the sense that it doesn't correctly describe how the market works at scale. At the same time, it is real in the sense that it's a close approximation of what we consider intrinsically fair.

Now, you can claim the judgement of the market should replace people's sense of fairness. In that case, there's no problem. Or, you can see the market being misaligned with our sense of fairness as a bug, and ask how it can be fixed.

[CuriouslyC]

Influencers/marketers don't create anything. If they all got vaporized by aliens, people would just watch/play something else and buy slightly different products, and the world would go without much of a hitch.

If all the makers disappeared overnight, shit would get crazy in a hurry. Faster even for things like plumbers/electricians/etc, who get paid less than engineers ironically.

Tell me again about the value that influencers create.

[Existenceblinks]

I poke around my govt sites .. they are using nextjs mostly now (previously php). New gen developers now got tricked and stuck in this era of poor quality career skills. My firmware friends even write javascript these days .. i'm like .. okay.

[agumonkey]

apple corp.js

[brundolf]

They make good tech, but their marketing department manages to over-sell it anyway, which makes it hard for me to take anything they say at face value. It's a bummer they can't just let the technology stand on its own merits. They should know that engineers won't respond well to hand-wavy or exaggerated marketing.

[tipiirai]

Same here. Vercel have always felt super commercial. Now even more. Hard to trust someone who puts so much money and effort to marketing and hyperbole.

[MalseMattie]

I feel conflicted, because the deep dive[0] into turbopack after all these misleading claims still has me excited for the future. The suggestion that JS bundling is very similar to native linking[1] on a previous thread has convinced me that the incremental execution strategy turbopack has chosen is the way forward.

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=btqdaqEHw0A [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33334091

[ostenning]

When watching the Next.js Keynote it really felt as if I were watching an Apple keynote..

[anonyfox]

I recently tried to deploy a next JS app to aws lambda and gave up after a few days.

JS Framework that doesn’t support serverless (aside from the sponsoring company‘s walled garden) - won’t fly with me in charge for infra.

[georgyo]

You may like Sveltekit, it has adapters to be deployed lots of places! With the ability to write new adapters easily.

https://kit.svelte.dev/docs/adapters

https://github.com/yarbsemaj/sveltekit-adapter-lambda

[roci89]

Give Remix a spin. I've deployed it to Lambda, Cloudflare Workers, & a long running express server. It's great

[DoesntMatter22]

Remix deploys to lambda wow

[cechmaster]

I've deployed with this before on AWS without too many issues https://github.com/serverless-nextjs/serverless-next.js

[rhodysurf]

I use it with google cloud run and its smooth as hell

[pier25]

Next definitely supports serverless. If you deploy a Next app to Vercel it will get deployed to AWS Lambda.

[lagrange77]

Same here.

I'm very happy with https://github.com/brillout/vite-plugin-ssr

[simlevesque]

This is some good stuff. Such a simple solution to a complex problem.