Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by huitzitziltzin 1332 days ago
It’s too much money to turn down. The costs are next to nothing.

Sure, there might be some effects where a few users are turned off and leave the platform, but the loss of those users is likely outweighed by the gains from advertising, probably by a lot. I wouldn’t be surprised if they have A/B tested that to the extent that they can.

You are welcome to hate it but that’s the calculation they and everyone else who serves ads has made.

2 comments

Jobs was no saint. But, he would never approve of an initiative that he himself wouldn’t want to use.

Schiller was the last person that had Steve’s sensibilities.

Schiller took over the App Store in 2015. App Store Search Ads started in 2016.
Well shit. There goes that thesis.
We should really inform Phil of our disappointment. It's not like he needs more money after all. ;-)
> The costs are next to nothing

Ads are certainly profitable - the cost is damage to the user experience.

Historically Apple has prioritized user experience, which is probably why many Apple users (Gruber et al.) hate this.