|
|
|
|
|
|
by mtlynch
1321 days ago
|
|
|
>It's been proved in court that AI does not infringe on copyright or licenses since it generates things from an understanding of the whole, instead of directly stealing, just like the human brain does. Do you have a source for that? This SF Conservancy article[0] says that's not true: >Consider GitHub’s claim that “training ML systems on public data is fair use”. We have not found any case of note — at least in the USA — that truly contemplates that question. The first major court case I know about is the class-action case Matthew Butterick is trying to build.[1] [0] https://sfconservancy.org/blog/2022/feb/03/github-copilot-co... [1] https://githubcopilotinvestigation.com/ |
|
|