[simion314]

Your experiment is invalid, I did not proven that glue is 0% effective , so I already gave yout he claim that glue might be say 55 effective and maybe monkey shit is 6% and some water repelling fats could be 50% effective.

It is Apple fans that ppretend that glue is used for water proofing while Apple claims the phone is not water proof. So this fanboys need to prove the woprld and to Apple that glue purpose is to let you swim with your phone.

[sokoloff]

You said "What I can prove is that 'glue helps you swim with your iPhone is bullshit'".

This wager seems like an easy $40K, $10K to the charity of your choice, plus uncountable value in internet points if that's right.

*-https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33404844

[simion314]

The experiment will prove that you can swim but only in that exact same conditions, temperature, water salt content , humidity in air.

Why are you invested in this to contradict Apple documentation ? search this link for "swiming" https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT207043 , seems there is damage in many cases, maybe is not imediate so guys like you that change their phones often d not see the consequences.

[sokoloff]

So, if I won the bet, we would only conclude that under those specific conditions that your claim wasn't upheld? In other words, under those conditions, the glue wasn't bullshit with respect to swimming, but is under most other conditions?

You have no idea how often I change phones, but the fact that I'm well-experienced with changing batteries on family phones that I own may give you some hints as to the frequency thereof. (I use an XS Max from 2018.)