|
|
|
|
|
by pjc50
1322 days ago
|
|
I think you could make strong arguments for all of those: - fairly sure the Federalist society wrote a lot of words on why strong king-like presidents were bad; a strong individual post is a license for arbitrary whims of power - weak currency improves exports; the Chinese strategy for decades was a weak RMB to the extent that the US complained about it endlessly - "shareholder value" tends to be a horribly short termist metric that encourages hollowing out the business, reducing investment, and pinching the employees until they start leaving |
|