|
|
|
|
|
by taeric
1329 days ago
|
|
Claiming math as our natural language feels like a heck of a stretch. Unless you mean math as something other than the human construct we use to communicate it. I am open to the idea that things can get better. Indeed, I hope they do. I am deeply skeptical of pushes that what got us here is flawed, inherently, though. Not adequate to get us further? Sure. But actively holding back where we could have been if we didn't have it? Seems ludicrous. |
|
I mean intuition for state change in our meat bags. I mean measuring and building things that fit what we’d call in language now a use case, has been a thing humanoids have done forever.
Literally engineering an easier life came before language.
The problem with language is it couples ideas to emotions. It does not couple outcomes to emotions.