[capableweb]

> My main complaint is that their pricing is a little odd. Charging per developer doesn't work well for us when we sometimes have 5 devs working on the data vis and other times there are none.

Never seen their licensing before and yeah, that's a messy license for sure.

The way they put it, it sounds like you can just pay for one seat as long as no developers work simultaneously with the highcharts API/source code, so you could have just a note somewhere who currently "owns" the API/source code license in your team, as the cheapest license seems to be 150 USD/seat which is way higher than I would expect from a JS library.

> How do I count Developer seats?

> A developer shall mean any person who will be simultaneously working with the API and/or source code of our software in any capacity.

[ethbr0]

On the flipside, that seems enormously generous to smaller organizations, who could use 1 license, with the ability to dynamically reallocate in hit-by-bus scenarios. And affords them maximum organizational flexibility vs locking into a per-machine / per-login model.

Would be nice to see more companies offer licensing like this on the lower-end.

"Does what it says on the tin" + "Pay us some amount of money roughly corresponding to your usage" = "Make it easy for a user to pay you money for your product"

[ognarb]

This is also the buisness model of Qt and I agree this is messy.

[johannes1234321]

Qt however is a framework touching large parts of the codebase. So most developers will touch Qt-rwlated code somewhat regularly. Charting code is for many applications a small part which in addition is often somewhat abstracted away.