[bumbledraven]

“Objection, Your Honor. The question assumes facts not in evidence.”

Neither my comment nor the comment to which I was replying made any claim about the reliability of Elon’s statements, my beliefs on that subject, or the effects of Elon’s actions on my beliefs.

[Eisenstein]

Your Honor, the witness clearly stated in response to a question regarding Elon Musk's policies an opinion which clearly implied that Musk's statements in regards to free speech meant that he would have a free speech policy. Can we have the court reporter read it back?

"Question: Can you elaborate on his policies? I personally do not have first-hand knowledge of them. As far as I know, it’s currently a big question mark.

Witness: Elon has expressed support for free speech and treating both left and right equally."

Does the witness wish to clarify their statement or will they state the factors which lead to their belief that Elon Musk would do things in line with he says?