[dmitriid]

See, you accuse your opponents of the tactics you yourself employ.

Second, it takes significantly more effort to disprove misinformation and lies than to produce those.

Yes, I latched on to just one of the examples because if one is not a valid example, why am I to believe that the other examples are somehow good?

To continue with the first example, no, our methods of recycling are not enough. The vast majority of electronics end up in landfills, so it makes sense to both a) reduce the amount of hazardous materials in them (this "ridiculous law") and b) improve recycling (possibly other regulations).

The same, undoubtedly, goes for other "ridiculous" examples: misinformation, uncritical quotes from biased parties, and possibly outright lies.

However, it costs you nothing to spew this. It costs a lot of time to disprove you.