[quickthrower2]

How is that a competing take?

From the article:

> In both cases, the example on the left is what I call “low-resolution writing”. There is very little context, too much reliance on pronouns and unclear references. The writing is not emphatic —the reader has to spend extra energy to work out what is being said

Your comment here is the main point of the article, which is a point made multiple times within it.