[cameron_b]

I am always disappointed in a survey's methodology when they try to assert their "truthiness" and explain their methodology.

The part that got me is the note about weighted responses to match the population. That needs mathematical explanation if its to be included, otherwise just say it's graded on a curve of "I'm pretty sure this response is more important."

Toward the article and similar authors:

Surveys are hard, sure but don't hide a 2006-respondent note and assert it actually represents anything. Sure I agree with the top line assertion, but I don't think this is reporting, it's just an opinion piece with a larger expense account.