|
|
|
|
|
by apenwarr
1328 days ago
|
|
(I'm a tailscale cofounder) I think of Tailscale more like a set of tools that lets you do any architecture you want. Nobody has to use Tailscale ssh console, but if you believe in the future of wasm -> apps -> web console -> ssh, now you can have it. On the other hand, if you believe in the future of OS private network connectivity -> console -> ssh, then you had that already with native Tailscale and Tailscale ssh. If you believe in OS private network connectivity -> browser -> javascript console -> ssh, then you can do that too, by installing tailscale in the native OS and then the browser can use it. I actually agree with you, I'm very suspicious about a world where we just move everything into the web browser. But on the other hand, sometimes it's really handy to have that option. |
|
To be honest I can't evaluate your product at work- to determine whether it helps our users and whether the idea of moving more of the network stack into the application makes sense- because my corporation (a large multinational pharma) disallows us from visiting the entire tailscale website because you sell a VPN product(!) which isn't our standard one. I'd love to change that policy but I'd still want to move to a BeyondCorp world (https w/ auth), not put a VPN in my browser. Or make Tailscale our standard VPN.
I see the point of "it's really handy". That's how we got Javascript which is a cost we now all have to pay.