Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by carpenecopinum 1336 days ago
> ...was based on countries’ short-term goals for the next decade

What else though? There is no "long-term" for politicians that have to face another election in less than 4 years.

"This will happen in 10+ years" is just a thinly-veiled "We aren't going to do it.". If we can't get any short term commitments and hold people accountable for it, nothing substantial will get done.

2 comments

How I see this unfolding, at the very least, is full-on militarization of the youth (mass protest, boycott, and terrorism) when they see that no one is doing anything substantive to solve the problem. You can already see quasi-violent climate change protests in the EU/UK.

They will organize via TikTok, or whatever social media dujour, and stop life as we know it.

Just keep bickering.

> What else though? There is no "long-term" for politicians that have to face another election in less than 4 years.

Politicians used to have long term vision though. See the American founding fathers, Churchill, de Gaulle, etc.

Something changed, it wasn't always like that

Look at the New Green Deal proposed by some Democrats in 2019. It was a non-binding resolution. An attempt to give the US congress a long-term vision.

There wasn't an attempt to compromise. Every Republican Representative could have attempted an amendment to temper language they didn't like. There could have been a debate on the merits of the resolution.

It was turned into a hit piece so every time AOC is mentioned in social media some smarmy user pops up and screeches about hamburgers or cow flatulence.