|
|
|
|
|
|
by timanglade
1325 days ago
|
|
|
Assuming you had code that somehow could either be packaged as a linux container, or as a Wasm binary, then the advantage of the latter would be that yes Wasm supports multiple CPU architectures out of the box, it also consumes less resources (memory, etc.), will usually have faster start times, and the Wasm security sandboxing is stronger. |
|
|
Really? I would not have expected that. Is that just under the assumption that most apps have an underlying OS (like alpine) and aren't on a scratch container?