Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by jmags 5305 days ago
I have to say that reading HN does not give me the impression that its posters tend to be anti-Apple.
1 comments

Not really what I was saying. What I'm saying is that the same zombie falsehoods are repeated in every thread. Even worse, falsehoods are rewarded with upvotes because, more and more, bias trumps accuracy.

It becomes tiresome to correct them over and over again only to see that once again the highest voted comment is based on the falsehood that "Apple is reaping the whirlwind" because "they [took] the first shot."

And inasmuch as you can generalize about a diverse community it's not a great leap to go from the observation that these factually inaccurate comments are often the highest upvoted to say that when it comes to IP Apple is commonly treated here as the big bad.

This is despite the facts that:

(1) Apple is consistently the most innovative company and IP is supposed to incent and reward innovation.

(2) Apple has paid out more for patent infringement then all their innocent lamb competitors (put together?).

Apple is consistently the most innovative company

What does that even mean? You've got three unprovable terms in there: consistently (What does it mean to be consistently innovative? Wouldn't Apple's copying of Android's notifications system contradict this?), most (What metric are you using to measure innovation that gives the highest number to Apple?), and innovative (How do you define innovation in this context? Patents filed (bogus)? Profit margins (not correlated)? Intensity of reality distortion? Lines of code?).

"Apple has paid out more for patent infringement then all their innocent lamb competitors (put together?"

If they are "innocent lambs", why in the world would you expect them to be paying out for patent infringement?