|
|
|
|
|
by stochastimus
1336 days ago
|
|
Too bad the Maginot line is mentioned only in passing in the blog - the Maginot line really is a testament to the failure of central planning and bureaucracy to produce and execute on ideas that stand the tests of time and battle. A drastic (but mostly true) oversimplification is this: France, seeing Hitler’s military buildup, created an impenetrable fortress along the border and sucked the life out of the French economy to build, supply, and man it. One failure was the inability to see that German light armor could navigate the Ardennes forest and circumvent it. Another failure was that the massive gun turrets periodically embedded in the fortification were designed so that they couldn’t be rotated to point back toward France; as a result, they couldn’t be used to defend against an army which had circumvented the wall. So, in the end, the French had simply provided the Germans with a massive cache of ammunition, food, guns, and other supplies which were all stocked within the Maginot fortification. Here’s the wikipedia entry for anyone interested: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maginot_Line |
|
Absolutely not. No-one ever expected the Maginot line to hold more than a few weeks.
It's goal was two-fold:
And both goals were achieved.> Another failure was that the massive gun turrets periodically embedded in the fortification were designed so that they couldn’t be rotated to point back toward France
That's absolutely not a failure, it's a lesson learned from WWI: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_Douaumont