|
|
|
|
|
by demindiro
1338 days ago
|
|
I browse without JS by default (using uMatrix), not to resist fingerprinting but because it is: - More secure, especially if the website doesn't use TLS. - Faster. Many websites work well enough even without JS or only some of it. Disabling JS to resist fingerprinting may be counterproductive as only a minority of people disable it. My current approach is to use LibRedirect[1] et al to avoid using big websites such as YouTube directly. In Firefox I also disable network.http.sendRefererHeader. It breaks some websites which rely on it for "security" though. [1] https://github.com/libredirect/LibRedirect EDIT: I just found out on the amiunique website that over 12% of browsers disable it. Does this include bots? |
|
The sample of users of amiunique is probably biased towards users that disable js.