|
|
|
|
|
by scarmig
1338 days ago
|
|
> I'd expect people to get sued/fired left and right over this if it's truly widespread. The attribute of being labeled male is not a protected class (maybe legally, definitely de facto) in the same way that of being labeled female is. To your broader point, disparate outcomes is ipso facto evidence of sexism. At least, that's what our society has settled on for other excluded identities, so we should do the same for men. |
|
"disparate outcomes is ipso facto evidence of sexism."
Lol, no. Again, please provide your definition of sexism, as this does not match the one in the dictionary.
There are plenty of things that are not sexist and have disparate outcomes.