|
|
|
|
|
|
by preseinger
1328 days ago
|
|
|
> The important question is not "is it better or worse than alternatives" but "is it enough for me". Yes, it is. All good! But if you're OK with O(100) RPS out of a server, then I guess basically every possible option is on the table. I bet `nc` spawning background `bash` scripts to handle requests would get to 1k RPS, even! ;) > HTTP/2 doesn't change anything. I guess that would work, as long as the fronting server managed all of the connection management details, stream demuxing, etc. But I wonder how you'd do that in a single thread? |
|
|