|
|
|
|
|
by AstralStorm
1329 days ago
|
|
Literally Rt for either of those is much lower, and sequelae plus death rates don't match in severity. Measles, similar to COVID, temporarily messes up immune system in a number of cases. (Though by a different mechanism.) Besides vaccine effectiveness - which is why COVID is not under control. And it took 20 years to reduce deaths from that virus worldwide. COVID explodes in similar ways as measles when it gets into a school or care facility. We are slightly lucky the Omicron is not as deadly as Delta... but new variants might be getting there soon. Even the worst influenza epidemic did not meet the Rt, and it was less deadly than Delta. That 100 years ago, before vaccines, after a huge war with starved people.
Flu now has also a half decent vaccine if the predictions work, better at neutralizing it and limiting the spread. I want to hear a reasoned argument why it should be compared to influenza or SARS, besides "it is an airborne spread". Even MERS is not there. |
|
this is exactly the type of unbounded fearmongering and disinformation that supposed science-advocates love to spread, as though covid will slip into a wave of death at any moment after experts forced everyone to get injected under the promise that it'd all end
> Flu now has also a half decent vaccine if the predictions work, better at neutralizing it and limiting the spread
half decent? that's a really generous framing for hit-or-miss low efficacy.