Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by DAVer98 1332 days ago
The opposite actually. Its been proven some drafts resulted in many more republicans being called up for service and there are sinister theories why this happened.
3 comments

The republicans in the WW1 era were the more liberal of the two parties, no?

The democrats at that time were reactionary populists AFAIK and “the left” would probably have been smaller socdem, demsoc and communist parties, as well as labour unions.

The parties were aligned differently, but the Democrats were still the party more closely aligned with labor at the turn of the century. For example, it was Democrats who passed the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914 legalizing labor strikes, which conservative courts had deemed illegal according to their interpretation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. (The Sherman Antitrust Act itself was passed unanimously, excepting one dissenting vote in the Senate--Senator Rufus Blodgett[1], Democrat from New Jersey.)

Similarly, Republicans have always been the party generally considered more closely aligned with business, in the sense of leaning toward laissez-faire capitalism, etc. In this respect they inherited the platform from the Whigs, such that this particular alignment of the two major, dominant parties goes back to the Founding of the United States.

[1] See page 3153 at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-CRECB-1890-pt4-v21/p...

Your evidence-free comment doesn't contribute to the discussion. If you have links, feel free to provide them.
People can discuss what I said and can share their own evidence if they agree/disagree. Im directing this discussion and bringing up a point. Are you an incel who thinks everyone must act like cucks and be granted permission to talk perhaps ?
Citation needed