(Worked on this project.)
> And novelty indeed lies in the width of the comb source and the SNRs of the obtained channels.
Can you expand on this? I'd be curious how it compares to a traditional (multi-laser) WDM system, probably others would be too.
> And novelty indeed lies in the width of the comb source and the SNRs of the obtained channels.
Can you expand on this? I'd be curious how it compares to a traditional (multi-laser) WDM system, probably others would be too.