[boucher]

We at Stripe (and more importantly, our PCI auditors) don't agree with this assessment of how the chain of responsibility works.

When you use Stripe.js, you need only serve your page over SSL and verify that you aren't collecting credit cards through other means to be PCI compliant.

[tptacek]

We don't do PCI assessments (I have a generally low opinion of the process), but we do the "real" appsec work for lots of companies that do, and the impression I have is that --- counter to what you'd expect --- 'boucher is right, and you can self-assess using their interface, despite the fact that anyone doing so is in fact an XSS flaw away from giving up cards.

In particular, while I have no idea whether Stripe's implementation is letter-of-the-law PCI compliant, I do know that 'LeBlanc's reasoning is not PCI reasoning (particularly: you can't draw a line from architectural susceptibility to "liable to audit") --- even though it's the reasoning I myself would use.

[lsh123]

Interestingly, PayPal actually offers (or offered?) an iFrame checkout for some customers and it was confirmed to be PCI-compliant. But again, another PCI auditor might have another opinion on it :)

[shivang]

Paypal actually offer a Embedded payment experience which in no sense gives the feeling of embedded payments on the website. https://cms.paypal.com/us/cgi-bin/?cmd=_render-content&c...

On this link you can find the experience of Embedded payments, i implemented it on our site but the docs on the api are not complete on paypal, rather complete they are not present at one place.

[saurik]

(PayPal Digital Goods for Express Checkout in fact uses an iframe.)

[lsh123]

Disclaimer: I work for WePay and I am directly responsible for WePay's PCI audit process

I am sure everyone would agree that PCI spec is complex and not easy to understand :) Said that, its intention is pretty clear: protect credit card information from leaking to "bad" guys.

A great deal of PCI spec is about protecting the stored credit card data. You are absolutely correct that Stripe's JS solution allows one to avoid dealing with these issues. However, many other sections of PCI spec discuss other potential vectors of attacks. For example, if you don't follow security coding guidelines then an attacker can embed a malicious JS on your website (through XSS or other attacks) and steal credit cards information. Obviously, the suggestion to serve your pages from SSL don't help you to avoid these problems.

I think Stripe's model is great. But I don't believe that it allows one to completely avoid PCI compliance. I believe that you correctly phrased it on the stripe's home page: "Stripe.js lets you build your own payment forms while still avoiding most PCI requirements."

[gtaylor]

I guess you could say Stripe gives you the shotgun, but you have to decide whether you want to use it properly, or blow your foot off.

So basically: Be smart about what goes on your sensitive, mission-critical payment-receiving pages, as you should be. It's not extremely difficult. A little bit more responsibility in turn for more flexibility.

[lsh123]

Someone already said in this discussion that PCI compliance is a legal term :) To some degree, it is a deal between you and your QSA (or you again if you are doing self-assessment). I heard about a few businesses that accept credit card numbers w/o bothering to do anything about security at all. You will need to decide for yourself the acceptable risk for your business in various "things gone bad" scenarios and how much you want to invest in protecting against scenarios that are bad for your business.

We've designed WePay solution to make it "out-of-the-box" as secure as possible for both our partners and WePay. We plan to offer more customization options in the future to improve usability while keeping it simple and secure to use. Doing security right is hard. We believe that WePay can help with it and make our partners life easier.

[nupark2]

This seems like a risky compliance hack to be relying on. While it might conform to the letter of the law[1], it absolutely does not comply with the spirit of PCI compliance in regards to securing cardholder data.

There's literally no security difference between processing the card transaction through your own servers, and processing it client-side via HTML/JS that your servers are providing (and can modify).

[1] I wouldn't have thought this would meet compliance requirements, but I'm not a PCI expert -- I've only had to work on compliance on the user side, and deal with the auditing requirements.

[LeBlanc]

Sorry, I should have made it more clear that with stripe you aren't liable for all of the PCI spec (I edited my comment to reflect that).

Either way, I think Stripe is doing awesome work and I hope you keep kicking ass!