|
|
|
|
|
by pantojax45
1328 days ago
|
|
> They also generated 100,000 random mutations to RaTG13 and BANAL52, and found that only ~1.2% and 0.1% of these This could also be selection pressure - right? Ie imagine 99,000 yield viruses that are non viable… you’d see the same behavior of rare traits being common. |
|
But regarding your broader question: there's no reason to believe that thesse viruses experience any selective pressure for the number or location of cutting sites of the particular enzymes being investigated here. They're bacterial enzymes, entirely unrelated to coronaviruses.